←back to thread

122 points hampus | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
anonymousDan ◴[] No.42199097[source]
One important question that I'm unclear on is how long it takes to fix one of these cables. If it takes months then that is quite a wide window in which an attacker could incrementally take down cables.
replies(5): >>42199191 #>>42199277 #>>42199299 #>>42199350 #>>42201672 #
booi ◴[] No.42199277[source]
Generally it can be fixed in days. They raise it from the sea floor and splice in a new cable section.
replies(2): >>42199352 #>>42200621 #
mistyvales ◴[] No.42199352[source]
Crazy that you can splice optical cable..
replies(3): >>42199397 #>>42199495 #>>42199622 #
dgfitz ◴[] No.42199397[source]
I mean… they get terminated somehow, right?
replies(1): >>42199812 #
1. dmoy ◴[] No.42199812{3}[source]
True, but splicing without leaving behind a powered repeater is different from the final termination with active electronics on the end.

It's pretty cool tech

replies(1): >>42200084 #
2. dgfitz ◴[] No.42200084[source]
I’m saying you can terminate cleanly without needing a repeater.

To be clear, I’m saying to terminate each end of the cut cable to a terminating device that continues the flow of light, not just the termination at the beginning/end of the line. Sorry if that wasn’t obvious.