←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
193 points chmaynard | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
smilekzs ◴[] No.42196192[source]
The SFBay I-880 and US-101 are always packed, often under construction, but still pothole-filled, with sections of extreme roughness. Compare this to our OR neighbors, where there are signs saying "your tax dollars at work" by ORDOT everywhere. I used to scoff at this as a display of insecurity, but apparently (from TFA at least), Oregonians' tax dollars _are_ at work.

CA takes so many tax dollars from my hands. Why aren't they "at work"?

replies(11): >>42196222 #>>42196287 #>>42196290 #>>42196332 #>>42196339 #>>42196533 #>>42196561 #>>42196800 #>>42196914 #>>42198006 #>>42199125 #
xvedejas ◴[] No.42196287[source]
I'd like to see California consider reducing the total mileage of roads and focus on having a smaller amount of higher quality paved surfaces. My neighborhood street does not need to be 60ft wide, and our freeways do not need more lanes.
replies(2): >>42196579 #>>42197908 #
s1artibartfast ◴[] No.42196579[source]
Oregon manages about 40% the road miles of California with 10% the population and 70% of the tax revenue per capita.
replies(1): >>42199292 #
xvedejas ◴[] No.42199292[source]
I imagine that all states would have more trouble managing more roads than they currently do, and less trouble managing fewer roads than they currently do.
replies(1): >>42199347 #
1. s1artibartfast ◴[] No.42199347[source]
I dont follow? Are you invoking some diseconomies of scale. California has about twice the roads but more than 5X the budget.
replies(1): >>42200422 #
2. xvedejas ◴[] No.42200422[source]
My prior post is choosing not to compare the two at all. In isolation, it is easier for California to handle fewer roads than it currently does.