←back to thread

152 points voisin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
worik ◴[] No.42168640[source]
> “I think having a regular $25,000 model is pointless,” Musk said a few weeks ago. “It would be silly.”

ROTFLMAO!

Says the richest person in existence. What an entitled nasty person.

replies(2): >>42168718 #>>42172750 #
015a ◴[] No.42168718[source]
While he did say that, its worth pointing out that Tesla also said that more affordable options will be available in 2025H1 [1]. Given Musk's statement, what I think Tesla means by this is more affordable trims of existing models.

I don't think its reasonable to read Musk's statement as "the Model 2 isn't happening". Its more accurate to read it as "it might cost more than $25,000".

[1] https://fortune.com/2024/10/24/tesla-model-2-affordable-car-...

replies(1): >>42172838 #
ceejayoz ◴[] No.42172838[source]
> its worth pointing out that Tesla also said that more affordable options will be available in 2025H1

Sure, but they've been saying full self driving is "next year" for a decade in a row. I take that with a large grain of salt. https://jalopnik.com/elon-musk-promises-full-self-driving-ne...

replies(1): >>42173232 #
015a ◴[] No.42173232[source]
Absolutely; but it is at least indicative of the direction Tesla is taking. It might be the end of 2025, 2026, whenever; but they've said they're working on lower cost models. That's all I'm asserting.
replies(2): >>42173590 #>>42173794 #
drawkward ◴[] No.42173794[source]
Why anyone would take Elon at his word is beyond me.
replies(1): >>42176422 #
015a ◴[] No.42176422[source]
Elon did not say that. Tesla The Company said that.

Ask yourself this: I bet you a thousand dollars that Tesla will release either a lower cost model or a lower cost trim of an existing model before the end of 2026. Would you take the other side of that bet?

That's directionality. Deadlines might get missed. I'm talking about directionality.

replies(1): >>42176650 #
drawkward ◴[] No.42176650[source]
You are now changing your claim; you originally said or quoted lower cost models.

Yes, I'd take that bet.

replies(1): >>42178813 #
015a[dead post] ◴[] No.42178813[source]
[flagged]
1. drawkward ◴[] No.42184970[source]
They certainly enjoy the fact that I don't make unsubstantiated and unwarranted ad hominem attacks!