←back to thread

152 points voisin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
bartvk ◴[] No.42168473[source]
https://archive.ph/9oIT4

I wish it would have adjusted for inflation. One quote: "The average transaction price for a new vehicle sold in the U.S. last month was $48,623, according to Kelley Blue Book, roughly $10,000 higher than in 2019, before the pandemic." However, about 9200 euros of that is due to inflation according to this calculator: https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

That's a nitpick though. All in all, an interesting article, which can be summarized as: the EV car market is lacking demand, and car makers definitely don't want to make cheap EVs since it's already so hard.

replies(6): >>42168514 #>>42168570 #>>42168574 #>>42168580 #>>42174015 #>>42174403 #
rootusrootus ◴[] No.42168514[source]
> the EV car market is lacking demand

There is scant evidence for this. Every time prices improve, sales surge. Sounds like the demand is there, but price matters. As it always has.

replies(5): >>42168553 #>>42168564 #>>42168764 #>>42173130 #>>42174414 #
vundercind ◴[] No.42173130[source]
I can't make great use of a full EV but would love more AWD PHEV options, of which there are currently few and they're mostly very expensive. A PHEV can be my everything-car that runs entirely on electricity for 90% of trips. I assume there's some reason they're not a more widely-supported option, but damn, I wish they were more common.
replies(7): >>42173295 #>>42173313 #>>42173354 #>>42173428 #>>42173878 #>>42174045 #>>42174402 #
f1refly ◴[] No.42173295[source]
Maybe because PHEV are a really dumb idea? You're lugging around two complete powertrains the whole time, a massive waste of energy!
replies(5): >>42173349 #>>42173379 #>>42173395 #>>42173618 #>>42178662 #
sgerenser ◴[] No.42173379[source]
PHEVs generally weigh much less than a full EV with equivalent range. Doesn’t seem very wasteful to me.
replies(2): >>42173470 #>>42175465 #
maxerickson ◴[] No.42173470[source]
And you get a big energy win with regenerative braking.

GP's argument can be countered with basically every hybrid getting better mileage than its ICE sibling in city traffic.

replies(1): >>42173887 #
mrguyorama ◴[] No.42173887[source]
The Prius gets up to 50 mpg on the highway too, much better than ICE cousins.
replies(1): >>42174139 #
robertlagrant ◴[] No.42174139[source]
How is that possible? What's it doing that ICE cars can't do on a highway?
replies(4): >>42174349 #>>42174499 #>>42175025 #>>42175770 #
mrguyorama ◴[] No.42175025[source]
The ICE engine in a Prius is a special branch of tech that is more efficient at the cost of basically kneecapped performance. Americans cannot stand needing a full ten seconds to get onto the highway, because we all drive like a bunch of roided up chimps who refuse to move over to give the merging onramp any room.

For two decades there has been a roughly free 5% or so in fuel economy available to any ICE car if only we could manage to be slightly more patient drivers, but American car buyers would literally rather spend twice the cost on a V8, gasoline truck, that gets worse fuel economy than it's $8k more expensive diesel variant, worse performance, and often a less reliable engine.

Americans will swear that a ten cent increase in gas prices will drive them to financial ruin, and then choose to buy the SUV made out of a terrible truck chassis that gets 20mpg. They did this despite having to learn the hard way back in 2008 what it actually meant for gas to be expensive.

replies(2): >>42179670 #>>42180080 #
1. sgerenser ◴[] No.42179670[source]
The latest Prius Prime can do 0-60 in 6.7 seconds. It’s no muscle car but that’s hardly “kneecapped performance.”