←back to thread

412 points thepuppet33r | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
thepuppet33r ◴[] No.42175024[source]
Yes, Google deserves to be distrusted and avoided as a whole, but Google Scholar is a genuinely net good for humanity.
replies(3): >>42175704 #>>42180078 #>>42181021 #
dumpHero2 ◴[] No.42175704[source]
I have similar feeing for Gmail (it's effective anti spam engine), google maps and google docs (which pioneered shared docs. It feels outdated on many fronts now, but it was a pioneer).
replies(8): >>42175773 #>>42175878 #>>42176170 #>>42177151 #>>42177404 #>>42179179 #>>42186118 #>>42187586 #
roflmaostc ◴[] No.42175773[source]
anti-spam is only an issue if people dump their email anywhere. I usually register my mail on webpages as first.last+webpage@mail.com and once they would spam this mail, it gets blacklisted.

I literally get only 1-3 real spam mails per month without any filter.

replies(3): >>42175853 #>>42176172 #>>42186581 #
janalsncm ◴[] No.42176172[source]
I see this recommendation everywhere and I am genuinely surprised that it works. Any spammer can find out your real address since there is an obvious mapping from + addresses to your real address. An actual solution would hide this mapping.
replies(1): >>42176304 #
1. bachmeier ◴[] No.42176304[source]
Yeah. Fastmail masked addresses are random. The best you can do is guess that an address might be masked, due to it not being johnsmith@fastmail.com, but it provides no information about your real email address.