←back to thread

152 points voisin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
latentcall ◴[] No.42173727[source]
I would love a 10-15K BYD. I was told recently desiring a BYD is un-American when I can spend 3 times the price on a Tesla. No thanks! I’ll hold out for something truly cheap. Cars in America are insanely priced.
replies(11): >>42173869 #>>42173877 #>>42173986 #>>42174041 #>>42174116 #>>42174124 #>>42174366 #>>42174694 #>>42174878 #>>42174953 #>>42175951 #
rootusrootus ◴[] No.42173877[source]
Protecting local manufacturers from cheap offshore labor is rational, especially if the offshore products are being subsidized specifically to undermine incumbents and put them out of business. I get that individual consumers want the cheapest trinket they can find, but the gov't has to be more strategic. And every country does this, including the one that would be the source of these trinkets.
replies(7): >>42173909 #>>42174055 #>>42174076 #>>42174130 #>>42174270 #>>42174472 #>>42175893 #
glial ◴[] No.42174270[source]
I exclusively buy Toyotas because they are cheaper to maintain than American cars. Is your argument that I shouldn't have access to Japanese cars either?

I understand the desire to have a strategic reserve of manufacturing capacity. However, the US also subsidizes the US auto industry heavily by e.g. bailing out GM and Chrysler. It frustrates me that US car manufacturers continue to make exclusively heavy, low-efficiency vehicles. Give me something inexpensive, safe, efficient, reliable, and I'll buy it.

replies(5): >>42174297 #>>42174504 #>>42174711 #>>42174756 #>>42175299 #
InDubioProRubio ◴[] No.42174297[source]
The protectionism there deformed the product and thus, the limited offerings are a result of the inability to compete in these segments.
replies(1): >>42174810 #
1. sleepybrett ◴[] No.42174810[source]
The product deformed due to lack of ingenuity related to the CAFE standards.