←back to thread

242 points LinuxBender | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
tomcam ◴[] No.42168915[source]
Not sure why swatting isn’t treated like attempted murder
replies(3): >>42168931 #>>42169121 #>>42173819 #
drexlspivey ◴[] No.42169121[source]
Well he is facing 20 years
replies(4): >>42169148 #>>42169327 #>>42172094 #>>42172611 #
saghm ◴[] No.42169148[source]
That's a pretty light sentence for 375 murder attempts and threats.
replies(3): >>42169281 #>>42172597 #>>42172844 #
pluc ◴[] No.42172597[source]
It's only attempted murder because American SWAT is trigger happy, equipped literally like an army and shoots before asking questions or establishing context, that's hardly his fault.
replies(3): >>42172630 #>>42173431 #>>42176293 #
lupusreal ◴[] No.42172630[source]
It's his fault if he knows his actions may result in the targets death and does it anyway.

"It's hardly my fault the police doused pluc with gasoline, all I did was throw a match"

replies(2): >>42172904 #>>42174083 #
1. everforward ◴[] No.42174083[source]
I agree that he is complicit, but I find it hard to view him as solely culpable for a death. If a child feeds law enforcement false data, and law enforcement then kills someone, both parties should have known better but I have much higher expectations of our law enforcement than a teenager.

The kid needs to be punished, but that doesn’t change the fact that we have a glaring hole in our law enforcement procedures so large that even children can exploit them. That’s insane. Children are always going to do dumb shit, we need to have policies and procedures to guard against that.