←back to thread

The withering dream of a cheap American electric car

(www.wsj.com)
152 points voisin | 1 comments | 17 Nov 24 23:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.428s | source
Show context
bartvk ◴[18 Nov 24 00:05 UTC] No.42168473[source]▶
https://archive.ph/9oIT4

I wish it would have adjusted for inflation. One quote: "The average transaction price for a new vehicle sold in the U.S. last month was $48,623, according to Kelley Blue Book, roughly $10,000 higher than in 2019, before the pandemic." However, about 9200 euros of that is due to inflation according to this calculator: https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

That's a nitpick though. All in all, an interesting article, which can be summarized as: the EV car market is lacking demand, and car makers definitely don't want to make cheap EVs since it's already so hard.

replies(6): >>42168514 #>>42168570 #>>42168574 #>>42168580 #>>42174015 #>>42174403 #
rootusrootus ◴[18 Nov 24 00:10 UTC] No.42168514[source]▶
> the EV car market is lacking demand

There is scant evidence for this. Every time prices improve, sales surge. Sounds like the demand is there, but price matters. As it always has.

replies(5): >>42168553 #>>42168564 #>>42168764 #>>42173130 #>>42174414 #
vundercind ◴[18 Nov 24 15:20 UTC] No.42173130[source]▶
I can't make great use of a full EV but would love more AWD PHEV options, of which there are currently few and they're mostly very expensive. A PHEV can be my everything-car that runs entirely on electricity for 90% of trips. I assume there's some reason they're not a more widely-supported option, but damn, I wish they were more common.
replies(7): >>42173295 #>>42173313 #>>42173354 #>>42173428 #>>42173878 #>>42174045 #>>42174402 #
lumost ◴[18 Nov 24 15:34 UTC] No.42173313[source]▶
PHEV means two drive trains, more parts and in turn more weight.

Do you really want a plugin car that loses its charge in 30 minutes?

replies(9): >>42173416 #>>42173449 #>>42173482 #>>42173523 #>>42173550 #>>42173616 #>>42173772 #>>42173778 #>>42173800 #
mschuster91 ◴[18 Nov 24 15:42 UTC] No.42173416[source]▶
That's more than enough to cover the average worker's commute, especially as most of the time is spent stuck in traffic.
replies(1): >>42173451 #
Kudos ◴[18 Nov 24 15:45 UTC] No.42173451[source]▶
That's not true, it's barely enough to get the average worker to their job https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/one-way-...
replies(2): >>42173817 #>>42175411 #
1. fwip ◴[18 Nov 24 16:15 UTC] No.42173817[source]▶
> Among this group, those leaving between 6:00 a.m. and 6:29 a.m. reported the longest average travel time to work at 32.8 minutes.

So, if "30 minutes" was actually how you measured range (and not in miles), the average worker in the longest group would burn fuel for 3 minutes, instead of 33 minutes. This is 90% less fuel than a traditional hybrid car would use in the same time.