←back to thread

389 points kurinikku | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
bombela ◴[] No.42164777[source]
The link takes around 10s to render. That's excessive for a text article.
replies(13): >>42164834 #>>42164869 #>>42165205 #>>42165207 #>>42165226 #>>42165233 #>>42165383 #>>42165497 #>>42165564 #>>42165692 #>>42165732 #>>42165892 #>>42167913 #
bicx ◴[] No.42165233[source]
Well, it’s a published Notion site, and Notion is a powerful doc creation platform. It’s not really intended to be a performant publishing tool.
replies(4): >>42165359 #>>42165667 #>>42166525 #>>42167907 #
criddell ◴[] No.42165667[source]
It’s a performant publishing tool (depending, of course, on your expectations) but it’s not a high performance publishing tool.
replies(2): >>42166416 #>>42166531 #
TeMPOraL ◴[] No.42166416[source]
It's a performant publishing tool and perhaps even high performance publishing tool - in terms of user effort. What it's not is performant displaying the thing it published.
replies(1): >>42167484 #
1. criddell ◴[] No.42167484[source]
That’s fair. Viewers who don’t know what is serving the page will be disappointed. If you know it’s Notion, then it works about as expected which satisfies the definition of performant.