←back to thread

389 points kurinikku | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.636s | source
Show context
bombela ◴[] No.42164777[source]
The link takes around 10s to render. That's excessive for a text article.
replies(13): >>42164834 #>>42164869 #>>42165205 #>>42165207 #>>42165226 #>>42165233 #>>42165383 #>>42165497 #>>42165564 #>>42165692 #>>42165732 #>>42165892 #>>42167913 #
yazzku ◴[] No.42165207[source]
46 domains blocked by UBlock Origin, 3 by my own NoScript filter. Seems about right for a "modern" website.

Edit: also, the pop-up menu on the right side that completely breaks your scrollbar. Putting that UI/UX degree to use.

replies(1): >>42165282 #
1. lelandfe ◴[] No.42165282[source]
Page weight is 7.2MB, 25.6 uncompressed. 110MB heap size. Such extravagant wastefulness.
replies(3): >>42165613 #>>42167953 #>>42168644 #
2. jancsika ◴[] No.42165613[source]
I wonder if that's large enough to contain an old linux running an old version of firefox and feed that the page content.
3. zahlman ◴[] No.42167953[source]
And this is for what, a ~100KB header image (most of which is bounding-boxed away) and 24KB of actual text (Markdown source would be only slightly larger)?
4. meiraleal ◴[] No.42168644[source]
They (tech companies) layoff people to save money but they should be hiring seniors to save them some cloud bills.