(www.sitebuilderreport.com)

244 points steve-benjamins | 1 comments | 15 Nov 24 13:23 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

JamesSwift ◴[16 Nov 24 20:19 UTC] No.42158973[source]▶

The article is “I tried every top email marketing tool” and starts with eliminating a majority of the field based on an arbitrary rubric of what the author specifically is looking for. Then fails to compare essentially anything about the tools to provide any semblance of a useful review for any other person to consume for their own research. I have to agree with the other poster that this really just seems to be a reasonable attempt to get affiliate link click throughs.

replies(2): >>42159123 #>>42163955 #

steve-benjamins ◴[16 Nov 24 20:40 UTC] No.42159123[source]▶

>>42158973 #

OP here.

What would you compare the tools on? Be specific

replies(2): >>42159146 #>>42159174 #

bitwarrior ◴[16 Nov 24 20:43 UTC] No.42159146[source]▶

>>42159123 #

I think the issue here is with the word "tried" and what that communicates. I think "compared" would be far more appropriate.

replies(1): >>42159219 #

1. steve-benjamins ◴[16 Nov 24 20:52 UTC] No.42159219{3}[source]▶

>>42159146 #

That’s fair! I actually “tried” more than the “elite 6” but I eliminated many of those tools for different reasons

↑