←back to thread

307 points MBCook | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
legitster ◴[] No.42150811[source]
In a big picture, this makes sense. You can load the cars with safety features, but it doesn't change the fact that these cars are very heavy, very fast, and loaded with features that reward distracted driving. In the US at least, the top killer of drivers are trees on the side of the road.
replies(9): >>42150846 #>>42151064 #>>42151101 #>>42151122 #>>42151123 #>>42151373 #>>42151792 #>>42152029 #>>42153004 #
kevinqi ◴[] No.42151122[source]
Aside from the distracted driving part, which is real, there are two physical aspects of the model 3 that I find to be safety issues as well-- the two front windshield beams are thick and add a sort of blind spot, and the side mirrors don't give you great field of view.
replies(5): >>42151166 #>>42151563 #>>42151719 #>>42152335 #>>42153221 #
GuB-42 ◴[] No.42151563[source]
It is a problem with most modern cars, and it is actually for safety reasons. These beams have to support the entire weight of the car in case it flips over in order to protect the occupants.
replies(2): >>42151660 #>>42153580 #
1. kevinqi ◴[] No.42153580[source]
ah interesting, that makes sense witas an explanation given the heavy Tesla base