←back to thread

307 points MBCook | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Koala_ice ◴[] No.42150928[source]
I thoroughyl expect the Deparment of Government Efficiency to recommend U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) be shut down to save previous taxpayer dollars.
replies(7): >>42150990 #>>42150996 #>>42151111 #>>42151200 #>>42151375 #>>42151410 #>>42151686 #
notyourwork ◴[] No.42151375[source]
Am I the only one that is not excited about the next four years being constant banter of this nature? I loathe it. Nothing personal against your comment but the new administration hasn't even gone into office and I cannot get away from this.
replies(24): >>42151401 #>>42151411 #>>42151412 #>>42151432 #>>42151486 #>>42151496 #>>42151525 #>>42151612 #>>42151615 #>>42151631 #>>42151694 #>>42151735 #>>42151769 #>>42151872 #>>42151883 #>>42151919 #>>42151923 #>>42151935 #>>42151937 #>>42152007 #>>42152012 #>>42152063 #>>42152289 #>>42153326 #
MBCook ◴[] No.42151615[source]
We’ve had them in office before, plus plenty of public statements over the last 10 years.

It’s not exactly baseless speculation. People have things to base their guesses on.

replies(2): >>42152117 #>>42152138 #
buzzerbetrayed ◴[] No.42152117[source]
Being right or wrong is often irrelevant to the question of “does it belong on HN?”
replies(1): >>42152773 #
sangnoir ◴[] No.42152773{3}[source]
Not only do other HN commenters largely agree that it belongs to HN, they decided that it deserves to be the top comment on this discussion, at the time I authored this comment
replies(1): >>42152976 #
notyourwork ◴[] No.42152976{4}[source]
Which is sad for someone who has been here for well over a decade. I never came here for political banter, I came for technical discussion. Facts, truths and subject matter experts. HN is slowly becoming less concentrated version of that.
replies(2): >>42153132 #>>42153274 #
1. ab5tract ◴[] No.42153132{5}[source]
Pretending that “politics” exists as something separate or invasive is not only ignorant, it’s dangerous.

If this were a thread about IBM machines of the 1930s, would it be playing “politics” to note that those machines were sold to Nazis and supported by IBM through sub-contractors even while we were at war with them? Is it crossing a line to mention they were used to facilitate the Holocaust?