←back to thread

307 points MBCook | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Koala_ice ◴[] No.42150928[source]
I thoroughyl expect the Deparment of Government Efficiency to recommend U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) be shut down to save previous taxpayer dollars.
replies(7): >>42150990 #>>42150996 #>>42151111 #>>42151200 #>>42151375 #>>42151410 #>>42151686 #
notyourwork ◴[] No.42151375[source]
Am I the only one that is not excited about the next four years being constant banter of this nature? I loathe it. Nothing personal against your comment but the new administration hasn't even gone into office and I cannot get away from this.
replies(24): >>42151401 #>>42151411 #>>42151412 #>>42151432 #>>42151486 #>>42151496 #>>42151525 #>>42151612 #>>42151615 #>>42151631 #>>42151694 #>>42151735 #>>42151769 #>>42151872 #>>42151883 #>>42151919 #>>42151923 #>>42151935 #>>42151937 #>>42152007 #>>42152012 #>>42152063 #>>42152289 #>>42153326 #
seanmcdirmid ◴[] No.42151411[source]
They have already announced what they are going to do, with the pro-Trump side saying he's not serious or will mellow out the plan before he takes office, and the anti-Trump side saying he will do exactly what he says he's going to do.

Basically a repeat of 2016.

replies(2): >>42151449 #>>42152130 #
weaksauce ◴[] No.42151449[source]
not a repeat of 2016 at all. he's got every lever of the government at his disposal. stacked supreme court, three branches of government on his side. hiring the worst people for every job possible and hiring only for fealty to him.

this will be much worse than 2016.

replies(3): >>42151562 #>>42151906 #>>42152105 #
zer8k[dead post] ◴[] No.42151562[source]
[flagged]
ithkuil ◴[] No.42151814[source]
Unfortunately complex systems cannot be fixed by simply going full forward in the opposite direction of a bad direction.

And yet we not only want to revert any decision that was made that we think correlates with an unhappy situation, we also want to choose people who are as different as possible from the guys we think are responsible for the unwanted status quo. So if the current politicians are serious people who talk in an articulate way we conclude that seriousness is a problem, because it's two faced. We conclude that being articulated is a problem because it's judgemental, it's a symbol of being elites.

If you conclude that serious looking articulated people are two-faced lying elites there are many alternatives in a multidimensional solution space. You could desire honest serious elites, or honest serious commoners, or many variations on the theme.

But no, we obviously want to get exactly the opposite, because that's the monodimensional thing to do! It's simpler. Let's pick the exact opposite of the people we have. Current people are too serious? Let's pick an unserious person. The current elites are too educated? Let's pick people that don't have formal education and/or that actively denigrate higher education. Etc etc.

I understand the human urge to flip tables. But if I stop thinking about it for a moment, I don't think the strategy is good. In rare cases it might be the necessary strategy, but in most cases it's destroying something that has plenty room for improvement and replace it with something that is much worse and will take even longer to improve over the previous one

replies(1): >>42151954 #
1. Chance-Device ◴[] No.42151954{3}[source]
> Unfortunately complex systems cannot be fixed by simply going full forward in the opposite direction of a bad direction.

Tell that to gradient descent.

(Though the step sizes are a bit shorter than four years)

replies(1): >>42155507 #
2. ithkuil ◴[] No.42155507[source]
Yeah that's why the second half of my comment was the dimensionality of the space