←back to thread

Maybe Bluesky has "won"

(anderegg.ca)
461 points GavinAnderegg | 1 comments | 15 Nov 24 19:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
nabla9 ◴[15 Nov 24 20:06 UTC] No.42150372[source]▶
Threads has 275 million monthly active users.

Bluesky has now 15 million total users (how many active?)

Mastodon monthly active usage has dropped below 1 million.

replies(15): >>42150387 #>>42150417 #>>42150464 #>>42150467 #>>42150473 #>>42150492 #>>42150501 #>>42150507 #>>42150541 #>>42150630 #>>42150749 #>>42150859 #>>42151143 #>>42152051 #>>42152785 #
lynndotpy ◴[15 Nov 24 20:19 UTC] No.42150492[source]▶
I believe Threads active users are artificially conflated with Instagram and Facebook. In all my circles, I don't know anyone who uses Threads
replies(5): >>42150526 #>>42150552 #>>42150657 #>>42150687 #>>42151326 #
criley2 ◴[15 Nov 24 20:25 UTC] No.42150552[source]▶
In all my circles, I don't know a single "X" user. Not even one. Anecdotes are funny like that.

Facebook monthly active users: >3 billion

Instagram monthly active users: >2 billion

Threads monthly active users: ~275 million

If they're cheating, they're doing a poor job of it.

replies(1): >>42150604 #
emidoots ◴[15 Nov 24 20:29 UTC] No.42150604[source]▶
When you post on Instagram, there are opt-out features that will 'automatically share to your Threads account too' and you can see Threads notifications in the Instagram app and such .. so I think it's reasonable to assume they are leveraging the Instagram user-base a bit.
replies(2): >>42150639 #>>42150701 #
1. threeseed ◴[15 Nov 24 20:36 UTC] No.42150701[source]▶
Threads is literally built on Instagram so of course they are leveraging it.

But that's very different from saying that Threads MAUs aren't specific to that platform.