←back to thread

Please stop the coding challenges

(blackentropy.bearblog.dev)
261 points CrazyEmi | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.401s | source
Show context
simonw ◴[] No.42148072[source]
> This is like asking a Ruby developer to debug PHP as a test of flexibility.

Sounds like an OK test to me. Great (senior) developers should be able to do that kind of thing. Categorizing yourself exclusively as "a Ruby developer" is a career trap.

replies(7): >>42148129 #>>42148133 #>>42148141 #>>42148181 #>>42148243 #>>42148386 #>>42148471 #
makk ◴[] No.42148141[source]
> Categorizing yourself exclusively as "a Ruby developer" is a career trap.

And a lucrative one at that.

replies(2): >>42148201 #>>42148280 #
bluedevilzn ◴[] No.42148201[source]
It’s lucrative if your bar is 6 figures.

No engineer that makes 7 figures calls themselves a ruby developer with the exception of DHH.

replies(5): >>42148244 #>>42148247 #>>42148262 #>>42148272 #>>42150249 #
qwertygnu ◴[] No.42148244[source]
There's no need to be shooting for 7 figures. Get a life
replies(1): >>42148552 #
bluedevilzn ◴[] No.42148552[source]
Working 40 hours and making 7 figures, gives you plenty of time to have a life.

The key here is not to categorize as a “language developer”.

replies(1): >>42148951 #
1. NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[] No.42148951[source]
Is 7 figures even realistic? I was under the impression that even a senior FAANG job was still just under $300k typically. Does anyone outside of a CTO/CIO make $1mil+?
replies(1): >>42149045 #
2. inerte ◴[] No.42149045[source]
I know half a dozen of Senior Staff at FAANGs and they make I would say around 600k - 700k, more of course if stocks appreciate but that's hard to control.

Consistent total compensation offers of $1mil+ is probably reserved for roles above these, sometimes called Principal or Distinguished. I would say the rate of having one of these in an org are like 1 for ~150 engineers.