←back to thread

Analysis of economic and productivity losses caused by cookie banners in Europe

(legiscope.com)
332 points vegasbrianc | 1 comments | 14 Nov 24 22:23 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
tonymet ◴[14 Nov 24 22:44 UTC] No.42141999[source]▶
This destroyed the world wide web, which was the major driver of the internet as a consumer application. I'm referring to the experience of intelligent & creative publishers sharing content openly on the web. This did far more to destroy the world wide web than ads or tracking
replies(4): >>42142046 #>>42142268 #>>42143737 #>>42145183 #
ben_w ◴[14 Nov 24 22:48 UTC] No.42142046[source]▶
Has Facebook ever not been hidden behind a login? Because even if that doesn't count as "intelligent & creative publishers", it certainly set a much harder trend to get around than the banners.
replies(1): >>42142145 #
ImPostingOnHN ◴[14 Nov 24 22:58 UTC] No.42142145[source]▶
> Has Facebook ever not been hidden behind a login?

Yes. Not sure when they added the loginwall, but it was relatively recently, compared to my birth.

replies(1): >>42142354 #
ben_w ◴[14 Nov 24 23:21 UTC] No.42142354[source]▶
Hm. Could've sworn it had one back in 2009…
replies(1): >>42142478 #
1. whstl ◴[14 Nov 24 23:38 UTC] No.42142478[source]▶
I think you two are talking about different things and are both correct. Facebook indeed had a login page back then, but you could use direct links to read public posts. Today it's roughly the same, but when you go to a direct link it shows a "Login Wall" that pesters you to sign up.