←back to thread

332 points vegasbrianc | 8 comments | | HN request time: 1.259s | source | bottom
1. tonymet ◴[] No.42141999[source]
This destroyed the world wide web, which was the major driver of the internet as a consumer application. I'm referring to the experience of intelligent & creative publishers sharing content openly on the web. This did far more to destroy the world wide web than ads or tracking
replies(4): >>42142046 #>>42142268 #>>42143737 #>>42145183 #
2. ben_w ◴[] No.42142046[source]
Has Facebook ever not been hidden behind a login? Because even if that doesn't count as "intelligent & creative publishers", it certainly set a much harder trend to get around than the banners.
replies(1): >>42142145 #
3. ImPostingOnHN ◴[] No.42142145[source]
> Has Facebook ever not been hidden behind a login?

Yes. Not sure when they added the loginwall, but it was relatively recently, compared to my birth.

replies(1): >>42142354 #
4. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.42142268[source]
Ads/tracking didn't destroy the web per se - besides the performance impact - but did/do destroy people's privacy.
5. ben_w ◴[] No.42142354{3}[source]
Hm. Could've sworn it had one back in 2009…
replies(1): >>42142478 #
6. whstl ◴[] No.42142478{4}[source]
I think you two are talking about different things and are both correct. Facebook indeed had a login page back then, but you could use direct links to read public posts. Today it's roughly the same, but when you go to a direct link it shows a "Login Wall" that pesters you to sign up.
7. pixodaros ◴[] No.42143737[source]
If your site has no tracking, it does not need a cookie banner in the EU. AFAIK Wikipedia or Archive of our Own have none.
8. sensanaty ◴[] No.42145183[source]
The only reason this exists is because of the ad/tracking parasites that infected the entirety of the internet.