←back to thread

Daisy, an AI granny wasting scammers' time

(news.virginmediao2.co.uk)
706 points ortusdux | 4 comments | 14 Nov 24 16:52 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
xnx ◴[14 Nov 24 17:47 UTC] No.42138885[source]▶
Seems like the logical endpoint of a lot of this is people getting paid directly for their attention. Want to call me? I've set a price of $5/call that I answer, and an additional $10/minute of listen time after the first 10 seconds. Want to send me an email? $1/email and $5/100 words. Anyone I have emailed is automatically on my allow-list, which I can also adjust manually.
replies(12): >>42139147 #>>42139164 #>>42139519 #>>42139522 #>>42139766 #>>42141330 #>>42141511 #>>42141816 #>>42142129 #>>42143384 #>>42143710 #>>42144710 #
tokioyoyo ◴[14 Nov 24 18:07 UTC] No.42139164[source]▶
And maybe like a temporary hold of the money, so you get it back if I’m convinced it’s not spam. Probably would resolve 99% of spam issues in the real world and create a chain of trust. Add some temporary disabling feature as well if you’re expecting a call from a random number too, so you’re set.
replies(1): >>42139712 #
swores ◴[14 Nov 24 18:51 UTC] No.42139712[source]▶
Sounds like a great solution to the minority of people like you and me who wouldn't mind the added steps of approving every real phone call as not spam after, having to remember how to set that you're expecting a call from a random number, etc. I can't see it being acceptable to enough people for any network to go down this road unless spam levels get way worse.
replies(3): >>42141172 #>>42142083 #>>42143917 #
1. plagiarist ◴[14 Nov 24 22:52 UTC] No.42142083[source]▶
Reporting spam should be the other way around, it defaults to assuming a normal interaction.

Consider: if you get harassed with a call or text you don't like, you send an SMS with that phone number to some known short code. You then receive $1 from the caller. If the caller cannot be found, the last verifiable link in the chain is responsible for paying the fine.

This would cause carriers to behave overnight, instead of allowing foreign call centers to spoof other people's real private numbers with your area code.

replies(3): >>42142784 #>>42145433 #>>42149552 #
2. kyleee ◴[15 Nov 24 00:25 UTC] No.42142784[source]▶
At least we can dream, ehh?
3. swores ◴[15 Nov 24 10:01 UTC] No.42145433[source]▶
That sounds a lot better to me
4. red-iron-pine ◴[15 Nov 24 18:32 UTC] No.42149552[source]▶
couldnt they just automate ways to handle the code?

plus a lot of spam comes out of compromised phones, or compromised systems. what good is this if i have your phone, or just your SIM?