←back to thread

625 points lukebennett | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.81s | source
Show context
jmward01 ◴[] No.42140562[source]
Every negative headline I see about AI hitting a wall or being over-hyped makes me think of the early 2000's with that new thing the 'internet' (yes, I know the internet is a lot older than that). There is little doubt in my mind that ten years from now nearly every aspect of life will be deeply connected to AI just like the internet took over everything in the late 90's and early 2000's and is now deeply connected to everything now. I'd even hazard to say that AI could be more impactful.
replies(8): >>42140699 #>>42140872 #>>42141362 #>>42141703 #>>42143108 #>>42143930 #>>42145614 #>>42146038 #
JohnMakin ◴[] No.42141362[source]
It's strange to me that's your takeaway. The reason that the internet was overhyped in the 2000's is because it was and also heavily overvalued. It took a massive correction and seriously disruptive bubble burst to break the delusion and move on to something more sustainable.
replies(2): >>42141769 #>>42149330 #
jmward01 ◴[] No.42141769[source]
I disagree that it was over hyped. It has transformed our society so much that I would argue it was vastly under-hyped. Sure, there were a lot of silly companies that sprang up and went away because they weren't sound, but so much of the modern economy is based on the internet that it is hard to say any business isn't somehow internet related today. You would be hard pressed to find any business anywhere that doesn't at least have a social media account. If 2000 was over-hyping things I just don't see it.
replies(2): >>42141844 #>>42142165 #
1. JohnMakin ◴[] No.42141844[source]
pets.com was valued at $400 million based almost completely on its domain name. That's the classic example. People were throwing buckets of money at any .com that resolved to a site and almost all of it failed. I'm not sure how that doesn't meet the definition of over-hyped. It feels very similar to now. Not even to mention - the web largely doesn't consist of .com sites anymore, it's mostly a few centralized sites and apps.
replies(1): >>42143744 #
2. dmix ◴[] No.42143744[source]
Wasn't that mostly from public markets which never invested in tech before?
replies(1): >>42143896 #
3. infamouscow ◴[] No.42143896[source]
There is a graveyard of hardware companies from the 70s, 80s, and 90s.
replies(1): >>42146078 #
4. zkry ◴[] No.42146078{3}[source]
a lot of which were founded on the promises of AI: symbolics, thinking machines corporation