←back to thread

391 points JSeymourATL | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
shmatt ◴[] No.42136701[source]
I have to put out a ghost job req and interview every person applying within reason for every green card a direct report is applying for. I have to show there are or aren’t any residents or citizens that can fill the job

The main problem is: even if the interviewee knocks it out of the park, is an amazing engineer, I still am not interested in firing my OPT/h1b team member who can still legally work for 2-3 years. So while I will deny their green card application and not submit it, I also won’t hire the interviewee

replies(31): >>42136752 #>>42136767 #>>42136774 #>>42136780 #>>42136810 #>>42136823 #>>42136839 #>>42136883 #>>42136886 #>>42136915 #>>42136920 #>>42136923 #>>42136962 #>>42137042 #>>42137071 #>>42137140 #>>42137317 #>>42137324 #>>42137482 #>>42137543 #>>42137550 #>>42137609 #>>42137707 #>>42137852 #>>42137859 #>>42137899 #>>42138253 #>>42138557 #>>42138666 #>>42139472 #>>42139846 #
ndiddy ◴[] No.42136810[source]
I'm glad our government has introduced the H1B program to help out employers like you who are dealing with a shortage of tech workers (who will work for 2/3 market and will do anything you say because if they get fired they'll be deported).
replies(7): >>42137249 #>>42137397 #>>42137451 #>>42137601 #>>42138017 #>>42138211 #>>42140763 #
bluGill ◴[] No.42137397[source]
H1b should be a bid salery to play not first to apply. That is we will allow x of them, when you sponser someone you commit to paying them some salary for the full term - no layoffs (you get fire for cause but that is a legal thing they can take you to court for , and the courts can force you to give back pay if it wasn't a good cause) , you should know your budget can afford them. , someone who really is the best , offer them a million dollars to be sure they get in , just a warm body , if they don't get in who cares.

There are ways to abuse the above, but note they can always quit.

replies(4): >>42137481 #>>42137749 #>>42139315 #>>42140552 #
para_parolu ◴[] No.42137481[source]
This means small companies may not get good talent that value things besides salary (wfh, perks, fun project) and will have to compete with corporations for people who only cares about money. This may (or may not) impact startups
replies(2): >>42137685 #>>42138025 #
gigel82 ◴[] No.42138025[source]
Stop it, no one "values things besides salary", and you know it.
replies(12): >>42138095 #>>42138123 #>>42138355 #>>42138581 #>>42138645 #>>42139184 #>>42139454 #>>42139483 #>>42139554 #>>42139701 #>>42143552 #>>42180505 #
freeone3000 ◴[] No.42138123[source]
I value a good manager, a fun team, an actual PTO policy I can use, and cool projects to work with at about $40,000 a year. Salary is valuable but it is not the only valuable thing.
replies(2): >>42140304 #>>42141210 #
consteval ◴[] No.42140304[source]
Salary is the most valuable thing, however. Because I would happily take a salary of 1 billion dollars with an awful manager and a no-fun team. And, conversely, I would never take a job with the best people on planet earth for a salary of one dollar.
replies(2): >>42140545 #>>42140572 #
jfengel ◴[] No.42140572{3}[source]
If you were offered a job with an awful manager and a no-fun team for $250,000, and a job with the best people on the planet for $249,999, which one would you choose?
replies(1): >>42140798 #
1. consteval ◴[] No.42140798{4}[source]
Right, naturally the extent matters, but it's still the most important statistic when doing cost analysis.

Also, other statistics are just wage in disguise. Work-life balance refers to working less, which means a higher wage. PTO is also just working less, which is a higher wage. WFH means less driving + lower cost of living, which is an effective higher wage.