←back to thread

Why is it so hard to find a job now? Enter Ghost Jobs

(arxiv.org)
391 points JSeymourATL | 3 comments | 14 Nov 24 14:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.606s | source
Show context
kossae ◴[14 Nov 24 14:57 UTC] No.42136720[source]▶
On the hiring side of this, we receive a _ton_ of resumes that have no experience in the technologies we're hiring for. Each day there are 5-10 automated resume submissions to our job portal for a single position, and we're a fairly small company. Perhaps hiring managers are both being (more) selective and becoming overloaded with the amount of AI/recruiter-sanitized resumes coming in as well.
replies(3): >>42136812 #>>42137701 #>>42137765 #
1. underlipton ◴[14 Nov 24 16:23 UTC] No.42137765[source]▶
>we receive a _ton_ of resumes that have no experience in the technologies we're hiring for.

No one wants to train employees anymore.

replies(1): >>42141615 #
2. JAlexoid ◴[14 Nov 24 21:51 UTC] No.42141615[source]▶
You're right... Companies should pay mid 6 figures, as well as downtime for training.

Short answer is that most corporations don't have a job in training people.

replies(1): >>42143155 #
3. underlipton ◴[15 Nov 24 01:35 UTC] No.42143155[source]▶
I can't tell if you're being facetious or not, but the fact is that, when Boomers and Gen Xers entered the workforce, formal training was provided for many entry-level professional positions, and even for higher junior-level ones. This was particularly so when the company was using unusual or uncommon technology. GP was complaining that "no one has any experience in our technologies." That speaks to an underlying entitlement, not just to employees' time, but to prospective employees' time. It's part of a broader shift of the cost of doing business onto everyone but the business (labor, customers, vendors, government).

Companies should pay what it costs to get people to give up a significant portion of their lives working towards their business mission, or else get out of the business.