←back to thread

173 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 6.993s | source
Show context
VyseofArcadia ◴[] No.42127346[source]
Time scale is also something I want to know about. "Can I remove CO2 from the air and turn it into something valuable in a way that is cost effective?" is one question. Another question is, "Can I remove CO2 from the air and turn it into something valuable faster than a tree?"
replies(6): >>42127397 #>>42127435 #>>42127671 #>>42127777 #>>42128010 #>>42128093 #
sampo ◴[] No.42127435[source]
> "Can I remove CO2 from the air and turn it into something valuable faster than a tree?"

In some climate zones, grasslands do it better than forests.

https://climatechange.ucdavis.edu/climate/news/grasslands-mo...

replies(3): >>42127874 #>>42128138 #>>42128536 #
1. marcosdumay ◴[] No.42128138[source]
Grass always do it better than trees.

And the GP is quite wrong, because almost everything will be more efficient than trees or grass. Machines are just way more expensive, that's why nobody ever made them.