←back to thread

285 points ashitlerferad | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
pipeline_peak ◴[] No.42065845[source]
Pro: We won’t have to repurchase games.

Con: Assuming native compatibility, this likely won’t be a very exciting console.

replies(2): >>42065910 #>>42067080 #
Retr0id ◴[] No.42067080[source]
Consoles have had architecturally unexciting hardware for a while now, what kind of thing were you expecting?
replies(1): >>42067952 #
pipeline_peak ◴[] No.42067952[source]
I was / (am still sort of) expecting Nintendo will make a product that’s exciting. Not a Switch 2 we can look back on and say “man this company hasn’t made a significant console since 2016”.

To be fair, I predict a Netflix of gaming in the future so maybe this is a safe move, idk.

replies(1): >>42068173 #
Retr0id ◴[] No.42068173[source]
The Nintendo DS was "interesting" relative to the GBA (if you ask me), but still had native back-compat.

I agree that the Switch 2 will likely be "more of the same", but I don't really see how that relates to back-compat?

replies(1): >>42071612 #
1. pipeline_peak ◴[] No.42071612[source]
I forgot about how drastic the Wii was regardless of native compatibility with GameCube.

I guess I was under the assumption that because on the joy cons unique format, it would be hard to escape with fully compatible support. But I didn’t own a Switch for very long so idk if that’s true.

replies(1): >>42072320 #
2. Uvix ◴[] No.42072320[source]
Most if not all games also support the Pro Controller. The Joycons' uniqueness is more about the form factor than anything functional.