Con: Assuming native compatibility, this likely won’t be a very exciting console.
Con: Assuming native compatibility, this likely won’t be a very exciting console.
>Hopefully Nintendo learned its lessons from the Wii U.
That’s my concern, Nintendo doesn’t like incremental titles like “Switch 2”. They’d rather call it something weird like “Switch Me” which only confuses non informed customers.
To be fair, I predict a Netflix of gaming in the future so maybe this is a safe move, idk.
I agree that the Switch 2 will likely be "more of the same", but I don't really see how that relates to back-compat?
I guess I was under the assumption that because on the joy cons unique format, it would be hard to escape with fully compatible support. But I didn’t own a Switch for very long so idk if that’s true.
But... this is in direct contradiction to what you're saying.
The Wii U was essentially a beefier Wii and it failed. It wasn't revolutionary, wasn't much of a new form factor. But it did have beautiful games.
If you look at all the Nintendo consoles that ate up the competition, none of them are "iterations". They're brand-new things. DS, Wii, Switch were all major departures from what came before them.