←back to thread

410 points empressplay | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.628s | source
Show context
strongpigeon ◴[] No.42071124[source]
To be clear, they're not banning the app, they're banning ByteDance from having offices in Canada
replies(4): >>42071154 #>>42071166 #>>42071185 #>>42071271 #
1. outside1234 ◴[] No.42071166[source]
What is the strategy here? Why does banning ByteDance from having offices in Canada do anything?
replies(3): >>42071239 #>>42071283 #>>42071913 #
2. AnotherGoodName ◴[] No.42071239[source]
Could it be the start of a series of legislation to make it impossible to operate the app which would be more palatable to the public than a ban?

1: Ban presence in the country

2: Add data provision requirements that personal information be stored in the country.

3: TikTok can’t meet requirements? Well that’s on them, guess they can’t operate here.

replies(1): >>42071418 #
3. alephnerd ◴[] No.42071283[source]
> What is the strategy here

1. Show the current government is doing something after the CSE said the Canadian government has been breached by China's MSS [0]

2. A response to China for breaching Canada's systems.

3. A way to get a quick win to make bipartisan China hawks across the border in the US happy.

[0] - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cse-cyber-threats-china-1.7...

4. dylan604 ◴[] No.42071418[source]
What if ByteDance operating outside of Canada stores the data in ca-central-1?
5. ◴[] No.42071913[source]