Most active commenters
  • greenie_beans(3)
  • kemiller2002(3)
  • ks2048(3)
  • seanmcdirmid(3)

←back to thread

Learning not to trust the All-In podcast

(passingtime.substack.com)
349 points paulpauper | 21 comments | | HN request time: 2.001s | source | bottom
1. greenie_beans ◴[] No.42066604[source]
I watched their election result livestream last night. They had some notable guests, like Donald Trump Jr. and Steve Bannon. Bannon was excited about the prospect of deporting 15 million people. Jason seemed shocked, as if this wasn't what he's been supporting all along. Does he not realize that he's in bed with fascists? Or he's just a fascist too?

They hinted at knowing who will be the secretary of state and treasury secretary, like it was somebody in their circle. Seemed like Elon Musk will be Trump's righthand man, the way they were acting. They were hyper-fixated on DEI and "woke" in politics. They think the government should be run like a CEO, obviously influenced by Moldbug ideas. Sure, they might be very skilled at becoming rich, but these are not the people we want in government.

replies(6): >>42066661 #>>42066862 #>>42066879 #>>42066974 #>>42068098 #>>42070108 #
2. kemiller2002 ◴[] No.42066661[source]
Anybody who is going to be shocked at what happens as far as aggressive policies aimed at women, minorities, immigrants, the elderly, and the lower income brackets really has no excuse. They haven't been shy in stating their intentions. You can say you made a choice to support it, but don't hide and say you didn't know.
replies(2): >>42066751 #>>42067274 #
3. voisin ◴[] No.42066751[source]
100%. In 2016 it was fair to be shocked that he meant what he said literally rather than figuratively in a crass manner of getting elected. I think everyone expected he would cut to the middle once elected, as he was a New York democrat for his whole life. But in 2024 we now know that when he says something he means it.
replies(1): >>42066797 #
4. kemiller2002 ◴[] No.42066797{3}[source]
I will firmly admit, that in the 2015 primaries I thought he was the lesser of 2 evils between him and Ted Cruz. I will absolutely state that I was foolish and wrong. That's not happening again.
5. henning ◴[] No.42066862[source]
Trump is not skilled at becoming rich. He is skilled at losing money and getting bailed out by his rich father over and over. If you're rich enough, you can be a total loser and it doesn't matter.
replies(1): >>42066886 #
6. winterrx ◴[] No.42066879[source]
> They hinted at knowing who will be the secretary of state and treasury secretary, like it was somebody in their circle. Seemed like Elon Musk will be Trump's righthand man, the way they were acting.

I agree. It was a livestream last night and there were a couple slight slip ups that you could notice such as this, and Chamath being drunk causing his wife to take his wine glass away from him.

7. greenie_beans ◴[] No.42066886[source]
I'm not talking about Trump. This is about the podcast hosts.
8. Imnimo ◴[] No.42066974[source]
I remember seeing their interview with Trump over the summer. They came away convinced that Trump would offer a green card to every foreign grad student in the US. I remember how much trouble the Trump immigration policy caused for foreign students in his previous term. It's very hard for me to believe that Trump will do a complete 180 on that, and I couldn't understand why the All-In guys seemed to just eat it up uncritically.
replies(1): >>42067946 #
9. bongodongobob ◴[] No.42067274[source]
They won't be shocked, it's literally what they wanted and why people voted the way they did. You can't just blame corruption or something anymore. It's what people want.
replies(2): >>42067398 #>>42068233 #
10. kemiller2002 ◴[] No.42067398{3}[source]
And that is the saddest part of all.
11. senkora ◴[] No.42067946[source]
I remember that one. His campaign immediately walked that promise back hard:

> Asked for comment, the Trump campaign said in a statement that only after "the most aggressive vetting process in U.S. history" would "the most skilled graduates who can make significant contributions to America" be able to stay.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-foreign-college-...

Of course, no one was surprised by the reversal.

12. ks2048 ◴[] No.42068098[source]
> Seemed like Elon Musk will be Trump's righthand man

That seems like what Musk is angling for. I wonder what Trump will do. He could easily backstab people who helped get him elected if he feels they are too famous and taking some of his spotlight (Musk, RFK Jr). I suppose more likely, he just gives them everything they want and goes golfing.

13. ks2048 ◴[] No.42068233{3}[source]
I think lots of voters want "let's deport all illegal immigrants!"

I think they would be shocked if they understood what kind of operation it would take to deport 15 million and what the side effects would be. For comparison, the entire (huge) prison population is 1.9 million.

I think some terrible things will happen to immigrants (and people suspected of being immigrants), but this scale doesn't seem possible and will be fought against by powerful interests (businesses employing them, etc).

replies(2): >>42068309 #>>42068777 #
14. seanmcdirmid ◴[] No.42068309{4}[source]
Maybe they should just do what Canada does and have really high civil/criminal penalties for employing illegal immigrants (so no job, they just go back because no work)? The problem is that a lot of farmers, hotel owners, and people who work construction projects vote Republican also, so it seems like that will never happen in the US.
replies(1): >>42068878 #
15. threeseed ◴[] No.42068777{4}[source]
Latinos broke for Trump in unprecedented numbers, especially men.

Wonder how they will feel being constantly asked for papers lest they be thought of as undocumented and discriminated against.

16. ks2048 ◴[] No.42068878{5}[source]
I could image a gradual shift to something like that. But if 15 million workers can't work suddenly, there aren't people to do those jobs. Those people also buy groceries, pay rent, etc.
replies(1): >>42069084 #
17. seanmcdirmid ◴[] No.42069084{6}[source]
Ya, but being more honest about immigration is better in the long term. Well, I say that, but that's what Canada did and people (not just conservatives) are still angry. Instead of blaming illegal immigrants, however, they just blame legal ones.
replies(1): >>42070985 #
18. toephu2 ◴[] No.42070108[source]
Now they're fascist? I don't think you know what the definition of fascism is...

(sounds like you're repeating a talking point of the left of calling everyone on the right a fascist..)

replies(1): >>42070476 #
19. greenie_beans ◴[] No.42070476[source]
no, if it walks like a duck...
20. boringg ◴[] No.42070985{7}[source]
I think Canada had a poorly determined policy which the country couldn't handle the incredible surge of immigrants - especially those who came from south asia through the diploma mill college route and added limited value to the country. Also in Canada the more people come the worse the socialized services if it isn't properly managed (which it hasn't been).
replies(1): >>42071671 #
21. seanmcdirmid ◴[] No.42071671{8}[source]
Yes, they definitely over extended on legal immigration, although it should turn into a net positive maybe a decade later assuming they cut back on it now.