←back to thread

285 points ashitlerferad | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
vunderba ◴[] No.42064100[source]
They're being purposely coy though on what this actually means. Backwards compatibility with digital/e-games, or backwards compatible with the physical carts?
replies(3): >>42064225 #>>42064446 #>>42070266 #
tastyfreeze ◴[] No.42064446[source]
There isn't a technical reason to change the cartridge format. I don't see why they wouldn't just use the same carts if backwards compatibility is the goal.
replies(3): >>42064591 #>>42065943 #>>42068107 #
WhereIsTheTruth ◴[] No.42064591[source]
there always is:

- smaller

- energy efficient

- cost saving

and they are all valid reasons, it's a handheld, the form factor will evolve until perfected

replies(2): >>42065328 #>>42065344 #
micromacrofoot ◴[] No.42065328[source]
they could have made them smaller the first time around, but I have to imagine they intentionally chose not to — we have to remember that they're also optimizing these things for children... so smaller isn't always better for things like swallowing (which is why they add a bitterant to the current cards)
replies(1): >>42066532 #
1. vundercind ◴[] No.42066532[source]
Even at the size they are, I wish they were closer to GBA—cart sized.
replies(1): >>42068666 #
2. taikahessu ◴[] No.42068666[source]
You wouldn't vacuum a cartridge.