←back to thread

242 points panrobo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jsnell ◴[] No.42055205[source]
I don't know that 37Signals counts as a "major enterprise". Their Cloud exodus can't have been more than a few dozen servers, right?

Meanwhile AWS is growing at 20%/year, Azure at 33% and GCP at 35%. That doesn't seem compatible with any kind of major cloud repatriation trend.

replies(10): >>42055237 #>>42055401 #>>42055455 #>>42056381 #>>42057002 #>>42057897 #>>42059701 #>>42063493 #>>42074807 #>>42146570 #
WaxProlix ◴[] No.42055237[source]
How much of that is what technologists would consider "cloud" (IAAS, PAAS) versus what someone on the business side of things would consider "cloud" - office365, google gsuite, etc?
replies(5): >>42055267 #>>42055320 #>>42055382 #>>42057150 #>>42057204 #
tiffanyh ◴[] No.42055267[source]
Given that AWS is doing $100B in annual revenue and still growing at 17% YoY ... and they do NOT have a collaboration suite (office/gsuite) - it'd say at least for AWS it's nearly all IaaS/PaaS.

https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/01/amazon_q1_2024/

replies(3): >>42055288 #>>42055404 #>>42057599 #
gonzo41 ◴[] No.42055288[source]
I'd agree on IaaS/PaaS being the main driver. Id guess that everyone is running away from serverless offerings from all the main cloud providers. It's just day 1 lock in to a platform with no shared standards. It's very uncompetitive and kind of slow to innovate.
replies(2): >>42055344 #>>42055601 #
discodave ◴[] No.42055344{3}[source]
Amazon loves it when you run idle EC2 instances ($$$) rather than using Lambda.

Most real workloads I've seen (at 3 startups, and several teams at Amazon) have utilization under 10%.

replies(2): >>42056840 #>>42060139 #
1. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42060139{4}[source]
I think the solution to that problem is usually to have fewer and smaller EC2 instances.

And you only need to get utilization up to like 15% to make reserved instances significantly better than lambda.