Still not open source many hours later after multiple people said to put a license on it. Calling something open source when its not is really not okay, and it is hurting free and open source software.
It is open source, the source is right there on the repo for anyone to read.
It can be open source without being free software, it can be open source without having any license. If the owner has opened their code to the world to read, it's open source.
that is exactly my meaning of open source but as you can see so many people disagree, but now I merged random license so it is 0K now I guess :)
You picked the best license, not a random one!