←back to thread

420 points solcloud | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
tokai ◴[] No.41924295[source]
Still not open source many hours later after multiple people said to put a license on it. Calling something open source when its not is really not okay, and it is hurting free and open source software.
replies(6): >>41924342 #>>41924429 #>>41924533 #>>41925018 #>>41925263 #>>41942022 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41924533[source]
Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source
replies(2): >>41924557 #>>41924585 #
lagniappe ◴[] No.41924557[source]
>Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source

Not a great response. Do you know where you are right now?

replies(2): >>41924610 #>>41925174 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41924610[source]
Maybe I am just waiting for somebody to open PR for adding license cause it looks like everybody is lawyer these days
replies(2): >>41924710 #>>41924859 #
Vinnl ◴[] No.41924859[source]
Ah, well, if that's all: https://github.com/solcloud/Counter-Strike/pull/28

(It's kinda weird, because to make a PR, I had to make a fork, and then I added the licence to my fork, even though I'm not allowed to pick the licence, but )

replies(2): >>41925154 #>>41925340 #
Capricorn2481 ◴[] No.41925340[source]
They went with a more open license. Try to do better next time with your license choices. GNU is not nearly as open as the "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE."

https://github.com/solcloud/Counter-Strike/pull/27/files

replies(1): >>41925607 #
Vinnl ◴[] No.41925607[source]
Glad they did, because now my fork illegally adding a licence is legal again. Phew!
replies(2): >>41925704 #>>41928019 #
1. solcloud ◴[] No.41925704[source]
this is awesome :D