←back to thread

420 points solcloud | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.285s | source
Show context
tokai ◴[] No.41924295[source]
Still not open source many hours later after multiple people said to put a license on it. Calling something open source when its not is really not okay, and it is hurting free and open source software.
replies(6): >>41924342 #>>41924429 #>>41924533 #>>41925018 #>>41925263 #>>41942022 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41924533[source]
Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source
replies(2): >>41924557 #>>41924585 #
lagniappe ◴[] No.41924557[source]
>Yeah yeah yeah, I am hurting open source, my apology to open source

Not a great response. Do you know where you are right now?

replies(2): >>41924610 #>>41925174 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41924610[source]
Maybe I am just waiting for somebody to open PR for adding license cause it looks like everybody is lawyer these days
replies(2): >>41924710 #>>41924859 #
1. andruby ◴[] No.41924710[source]
What license do you want to share your work under? MIT? GPL? There's a couple of trade-offs in that choice.

Github has an overview of some of your options: https://github.com/readme/guides/open-source-licensing