←back to thread

79 points lemper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
dvh ◴[] No.41914112[source]
1+1=3 (for very large values of 1)
replies(6): >>41914192 #>>41914254 #>>41914313 #>>41914375 #>>41914460 #>>41915170 #
croes ◴[] No.41914254[source]
And 1x1=2 according to Terrence Howard
replies(1): >>41915470 #
omeysalvi ◴[] No.41915470[source]
Actually, it is a metaphor for formulating a brand new branch of mathematics that fixes the identity principle and all the problems with the square root of two. But also, it is not a metaphor because show me any physical system where an action times an action does not equal a reaction.
replies(4): >>41915584 #>>41915756 #>>41915995 #>>41916176 #
1. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.41915756[source]
> show me any physical system where an action times an action does not equal a reaction

Not quite sure what an action times an action is, but how about rotating a 2d shape 180 degrees? Do that twice and it's the same as not rotating it at all.