←back to thread

536 points thunderbong | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bufferoverflow ◴[] No.41904719[source]
Doesn't it take just one tourist with malaria to bring it back?
replies(5): >>41904867 #>>41904886 #>>41904887 #>>41905004 #>>41905456 #
umanwizard ◴[] No.41904867[source]
Malaria isn't contagious
replies(1): >>41905512 #
1. folli ◴[] No.41905512[source]
That's technically correct, but an infectious person can infect another person over a vector (i.e. mosquitos).

So you get rid of mosquitos OR rid of malaria.

replies(2): >>41907857 #>>41909256 #
2. umanwizard ◴[] No.41907857[source]
That’s true; I didn’t realize it could go human -> mosquito -> human but according to Google you’re right.
replies(1): >>41908537 #
3. tshaddox ◴[] No.41908537[source]
Isn’t that the only way? I’m pretty sure the human hosts are a vital step in the Plasmodium lifecycle.
4. arp242 ◴[] No.41909256[source]
Also not all species of mosquito transmit malaria, or have a much smaller chance of transmitting it. I remember watching a BBC programme where someone was researching whether malaria mosquito had returned to Britain (they hadn't).

So even if you would somehow introduce a few busloads of Malaria-stricken people, that's not likely to re-introduce Malaria.