←back to thread

285 points alephnerd | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.491s | source
Show context
neya ◴[] No.41901576[source]
If you use Azure in any realistic production environments, then it's on you. Even with $100k in free credits, they couldn't convince me to use it for more than a month. It is expensive, the interface is highly user unfriendly and most important of all, their products don't at all seem reliable for production workloads because of stuff like this. Sorry Microsoft, I think you can do much better.
replies(15): >>41901755 #>>41902286 #>>41902571 #>>41902679 #>>41902715 #>>41903167 #>>41903320 #>>41903580 #>>41903869 #>>41904371 #>>41904976 #>>41905535 #>>41905826 #>>41905858 #>>41907485 #
BSDobelix ◴[] No.41902286[source]
>I think you can do much better.

Not to be a troll, but I really think they cannot. The last "good" product they made was SQL-Server/Exchange/Windows2000, and that was a long time ago.

replies(3): >>41902716 #>>41902856 #>>41906939 #
mrweasel ◴[] No.41902856[source]
While I can think of a few other, dotnet and Visual Studio, I think that you're generally correct.

Microsoft, Google and others, have created a culture that are no longer able to produce high quality solutions, because they can't focus on a single vision for their products. Or in some cases the vision does not align with creating good products.

SQL Server is a really good example, it's highly focused, it exists outside the current hype bobble, there's no advertising, no subscription, just a database server and it's a really good product. Exchange sucks, because it been pulled in to new subscription based world, and it's going to suffer for it.

replies(3): >>41903139 #>>41904413 #>>41904979 #
1. j16sdiz ◴[] No.41903139[source]
dotnet is a mixed bag of good and bad.

VSCode catch on, but i would rather have Atom instead.

Exchange have beth broken before migrating to cod

replies(1): >>41906102 #
2. Tempest1981 ◴[] No.41906102[source]
> migrating to cod

cod? Call of Duty?