←back to thread

492 points vladyslavfox | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sirolimus ◴[] No.41896949[source]
It’s incredibly sad to see threat actors attack something as altruistic as an internet library. Truly demoralizing to see such degeneracy.
replies(7): >>41897626 #>>41897825 #>>41897916 #>>41897980 #>>41898064 #>>41898305 #>>41898351 #
xyst ◴[] No.41897980[source]
Blame bad leadership.
replies(1): >>41898098 #
callc ◴[] No.41898098[source]
Is there a reason to blame the victim, rather than the attackers?

I’m asking seriously - did IA do shitty things that make them a worthy cause for politically/ideologically motivated hacking?

replies(1): >>41898171 #
lolinder ◴[] No.41898171[source]
I imagine they're referring to the fact that the leadership showed extremely bad judgement in deciding to pick a battle with the major publishing companies that everyone knew they would lose before it even began [0].

I don't think that justifies blaming the victim here, and from what I can see the attacker doesn't seem to be motivated by anything other than funsies, but I absolutely lost a lot of faith in their leadership when they pulled the NEL nonsense. The IA is too valuable for them to act like a young activist org—there's too much for us to lose at this point. They need to hold the ground they've won and leave the activism to other organizations.

[0] https://www.wired.com/story/internet-archive-loses-hachette-...

replies(1): >>41899069 #
jampekka ◴[] No.41899069[source]
> there's too much for us to lose at this point

Feeling entitled?

replies(2): >>41899749 #>>41899870 #
IntelMiner ◴[] No.41899749[source]
Only if you don't care about history
replies(1): >>41901992 #
1. jampekka ◴[] No.41901992[source]
Books are not part of history?