←back to thread

The IPv6 Transition

(www.potaroo.net)
215 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
AdamH12113 ◴[] No.41893503[source]
I’ve often wondered if going with 64-bit addresses with a dotted quad hex notation would have eased the roll-out. I remember a lot of resistance when IPv6 was first announced along the lines of “I can’t memorize/type in giant addresses and I don’t want to have to use DHCP and DNS everywhere.” It felt like IPv6 never recovered from a bad first impression.
replies(2): >>41893535 #>>41893563 #
growse ◴[] No.41893535[source]
I'm not sure I've ever heard this view expressed by serious, competent network engineers. I have heard it a lot from the home hobbyist though, but I'm not sure how much that demographic matters in the grand scheme of things.
replies(3): >>41893735 #>>41897949 #>>41898108 #
zaphoyd ◴[] No.41898108[source]
I also find it really weird as the killer (only?) app for IPv6 is that home hobbyists can run servers with low overhead!

Additionally, like a sibling comment notes, a home hobbyist has full control over at least half, often more, of their addresses and can easily choose addresses for their network that are as short or shorter and easier to remember and organize vs a v4 network where you have no letters to work with much more strict subnet size rules, etc.

IPv6 is a dream for home hobbyists! The complaining from them about “unmemorable” addresses just makes no sense.

replies(4): >>41898689 #>>41899986 #>>41901568 #>>41909860 #
1. magicalhippo ◴[] No.41901568[source]
It's not weird. Many ISPs have dynamic prefixes, and even with "just" 56 bits that prefix is long and not very memorable.

Thus ULA is a must on the inside, and DynDNS is still required for anything internet facing.