←back to thread

373 points h2odragon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rglullis ◴[] No.41889863[source]
I am seriously considering creating a dropship company focused exclusively on buying and selling electronic components that are sold for parts and people can assemble them at home, Ikea-style.

I would start with selling 50" and 65" inch "dumb" TVs. Just the panel, a nice enclosure and a board with an IR receiver, TV tuner and HDMI outputs. BYO top box and Soundbar. I wonder how fast it would take to get 10000 orders.

replies(20): >>41889916 #>>41889934 #>>41889935 #>>41890016 #>>41890050 #>>41890156 #>>41890165 #>>41890259 #>>41890295 #>>41890309 #>>41890336 #>>41890401 #>>41890437 #>>41890651 #>>41890728 #>>41890783 #>>41891264 #>>41893166 #>>41893548 #>>41898157 #
pixiemaster ◴[] No.41890016[source]
please do. but it seems it would be more expensive to produce a tv with less features: https://www.tomsguide.com/features/dumb-tvs-heres-why-you-ca...
replies(1): >>41890278 #
leereeves ◴[] No.41890278[source]
"Google pays between $12 and $15 per unit to a manufacturer like TCL or Hisense per TV that uses Google TV."

I'd be willing to pay a $15 premium for a TV that is built to do what I want, not what an advertiser wants.

replies(2): >>41890636 #>>41892179 #
1. Wowfunhappy ◴[] No.41892179[source]
A problem, as I understand it, is that if you let all the customers with high disposable income pay extra to avoid ads, you're left with a group of lower income customers who are less valuable to advertisers.

Manufacturers would rather get $15 for every TV than only $15 for some TVs. If they were to let you pay your way out, you'd have to pay significantly more in order to subsidize the people who won't pay.