←back to thread

568 points rntn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
CatWChainsaw ◴[] No.41882137[source]
The Feds are coming, and I hope they keep going and going until there isn't a single product or service left that dares dictate what you can do after the transaction is complete.
replies(1): >>41882261 #
pwillia7 ◴[] No.41882261[source]
Say hello to your new Subscription products
replies(1): >>41882376 #
Gibbon1 ◴[] No.41882376[source]
I've been rolling the idea around that perhaps if a product is encumbered by a subscription then it's not a first sale and the product counts as inventory. And gets taxed as such.
replies(4): >>41882446 #>>41882512 #>>41883730 #>>41897231 #
twh270 ◴[] No.41882512[source]
I don't know the first thing about such things, but I'll bet if companies were pushed on this they'd suddenly start asserting that it's a lease, which I think is typically taxed similarly to a sale.

I hate the "everything's a subscription" business model that's taking over everything. We'll achieve peak serfdom when the air we breathe, water we drink, and food we eat is bought on a subscription model.

replies(3): >>41883206 #>>41883312 #>>41884308 #
1. CatWChainsaw ◴[] No.41883312[source]
If it were feasible to charge you for your own heartbeats, companies absolutely would. Infinite growth is a poison pill idea - it brought us to where we are today, and would drag us to the future you outlined, unless the folly is abandoned.
replies(1): >>41887950 #
2. datavirtue ◴[] No.41887950[source]
Nothing wrong with growth,it's natural. The population grows and so does the money supply in turn. This is good. What is not good is when a particular company is trying to retain ALL growth of certain segments for themselves through abusive leverage.

A principle that stuck out to me as a child was that our society prioritized lower prices for consumers as a whole over the prosperity of any one company or industry.

We let companies grow to the point where they now subvert the will of the people.