←back to thread

182 points Twirrim | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cyberax ◴[] No.41874839[source]
But think of ternary computers!
replies(1): >>41874847 #
dathinab ◴[] No.41874847[source]
Doesn't matter ternary computers just have ternary bits, 8 of them ;)
replies(2): >>41874880 #>>41874912 #
mathgenius ◴[] No.41874912[source]
Ternary computers have 8 tits to a byte.
replies(1): >>41875195 #
1. tbrownaw ◴[] No.41875195[source]
Should be either 9 or 27 I'd think.
replies(1): >>41875221 #
2. epcoa ◴[] No.41875221[source]
Why can’t it be 8?, the fact that it’s a trit doesn’t put any constraint on the byte (tryte ? size). You could actually make it 5 or 6 trits (~9.5 bits) for similar information density. The Setun used 6 trit addressable units.
replies(1): >>41876513 #
3. jolmg ◴[] No.41876513[source]
Might be advantageous to collect trits in powers of 3, like how bits are collected in powers of 2.

For example, if you want to address a trit in a tryte of 8 trits, you can use 2 trits for that, but you'll have a value left over. Seems a bit cleaner if trytes hold 9 trits.