←back to thread

182 points Twirrim | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
1. cyberax ◴[] No.41874839[source]
But think of ternary computers!
replies(1): >>41874847 #
2. dathinab ◴[] No.41874847[source]
Doesn't matter ternary computers just have ternary bits, 8 of them ;)
replies(2): >>41874880 #>>41874912 #
3. AStonesThrow ◴[] No.41874880[source]
Supposedly, "bit" is short for "binary digit", so we'd need a separate term for "ternary digit", but I don't wanna go there.
replies(2): >>41875125 #>>41875189 #
4. mathgenius ◴[] No.41874912[source]
Ternary computers have 8 tits to a byte.
replies(1): >>41875195 #
5. bryanlarsen ◴[] No.41875125{3}[source]
The standard term is "trit" because they didn't want to go there.
6. epcoa ◴[] No.41875189{3}[source]
The prefix is tri-, not ti- so I don’t think there was any concern of going anywhere.

It’s tricycle and tripod, not ticycle.

7. tbrownaw ◴[] No.41875195{3}[source]
Should be either 9 or 27 I'd think.
replies(1): >>41875221 #
8. epcoa ◴[] No.41875221{4}[source]
Why can’t it be 8?, the fact that it’s a trit doesn’t put any constraint on the byte (tryte ? size). You could actually make it 5 or 6 trits (~9.5 bits) for similar information density. The Setun used 6 trit addressable units.
replies(1): >>41876513 #
9. jolmg ◴[] No.41876513{5}[source]
Might be advantageous to collect trits in powers of 3, like how bits are collected in powers of 2.

For example, if you want to address a trit in a tryte of 8 trits, you can use 2 trits for that, but you'll have a value left over. Seems a bit cleaner if trytes hold 9 trits.