←back to thread

154 points davidandgoliath | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
runjake ◴[] No.41873436[source]
One important people to keep in mind as they read this post, the linked Google Doc, and tweets from the past day where a bunch of people are receiving unsolicited DMs[1] from Automattic with grammar that matches Matt's:

- Matt, under various guises, is shifting blame to different entities that are effectively himself.

- Automattic is Matt. Matt is the CEO of Automattic.

- The WordPress Foundation is, effectively, Matt.

- The problem is Matt. Maybe he's right about WP Engine, but the way he has and continues to handle everything has been disastrous.

1. https://x.com/GergelyOrosz/status/1846448485979107824

replies(5): >>41873619 #>>41873711 #>>41873712 #>>41873812 #>>41875327 #
zeruch ◴[] No.41873619[source]
"Maybe he's right about WP Engine, but the way he has and continues to handle everything has been disastrous."

This is the best single line distillation of the current lunacy. I mean with every passing day, it all becomes more and more unhinged, and I see no good outcome in the long term. The overall damage to the ecosystem I think begins it's death spiral now.

It's a boon for competitors I suppose, but that's about it.

replies(4): >>41873879 #>>41874079 #>>41874169 #>>41874306 #
mjburgess ◴[] No.41873879[source]
Well, he's not right about WP Engine.

Wordpress is an open source project. If he's "right" about WP Engine, then he's "right" about basically every user of every open source project, and there ceases to be any such thing. OS is take-it-or-leave-it, if he wants contributions back, put it in the licence and also offer support.

replies(4): >>41874182 #>>41874251 #>>41874494 #>>41874981 #
1. Dalewyn ◴[] No.41874182{3}[source]
Way too many progressive people proclaim the virtues of free and open and then <pikachu_face.gif> when others take them for their word.

If you want compensation of any kind you must stipulate them before the fact.

replies(2): >>41874683 #>>41875499 #
2. jeltz ◴[] No.41874683[source]
But is Matt progressive in any sense of the word?
replies(1): >>41875146 #
3. bigiain ◴[] No.41875146[source]
Perhaps in the "progressive cognitive dysfunction" sense...
4. philistine ◴[] No.41875499[source]
If that guy was a progressive, he'd give 70% of his income straight to the government.