←back to thread

Reflections on Palantir

(nabeelqu.substack.com)
479 points freditup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
beedeebeedee ◴[] No.41869866[source]
I'm amazed there's no discussion in the article about Palantir's role in Gaza and their development of Lavender and "Where's Daddy". That goes beyond the gray areas that the author mentions.
replies(2): >>41870222 #>>41894515 #
talldayo[dead post] ◴[] No.41870222[source]
[flagged]
bongodongobob[dead post] ◴[] No.41870583[source]
[flagged]
talldayo ◴[] No.41870871[source]
Some other opinions go back even further and more criticize Great Britain for their mishandling of Mandatory Palestine. There are a lot of opinions that develop as both sides adjust their strategy and the borders of their theater. Writing off any development of opinion (particularly in the wake of Lavander) is a counterproductive and insular habit.

If you don't want to discuss the behavior and morality of the IDF, nobody will force you to steelman them. But some of us would like to call that into question, and dismissing our conversation with "that's immature" is a thought-terminating cliche.

replies(2): >>41871062 #>>41871388 #
golergka ◴[] No.41871062[source]
Going back just to the Mandate seems like a very arbitrary point. It forgets about Egyptian colonisation of Palestine in 19th century, as well as treatment of Jewish communities across the whole Arab world, which explains a lot about the conflict and it's history.
replies(1): >>41871371 #
1. ◴[] No.41871371[source]