←back to thread

Reflections on Palantir

(nabeelqu.substack.com)
479 points freditup | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.997s | source | bottom
Show context
beedeebeedee ◴[] No.41869866[source]
I'm amazed there's no discussion in the article about Palantir's role in Gaza and their development of Lavender and "Where's Daddy". That goes beyond the gray areas that the author mentions.
replies(2): >>41870222 #>>41894515 #
talldayo[dead post] ◴[] No.41870222[source]
[flagged]
1. talldayo ◴[] No.41870871[source]
Some other opinions go back even further and more criticize Great Britain for their mishandling of Mandatory Palestine. There are a lot of opinions that develop as both sides adjust their strategy and the borders of their theater. Writing off any development of opinion (particularly in the wake of Lavander) is a counterproductive and insular habit.

If you don't want to discuss the behavior and morality of the IDF, nobody will force you to steelman them. But some of us would like to call that into question, and dismissing our conversation with "that's immature" is a thought-terminating cliche.

replies(2): >>41871062 #>>41871388 #
2. 0goel0 ◴[] No.41870906[source]
This is an extremely myopic take. I don't think I have seen many -- let alone "most" as you prescribe -- comments in any forums that resort to "war bad". Even on HN what I've seen is people with a strong sense of justice and ethics actively speaking out against atrocities being committed using US taxpayer dollars.

As for your line about people not knowing the history -- partially fair enough. Though that's also a propaganda line spread by Israel to keep people out of the metaphoric town hall. If you really believe that to join a movement you must first learn the entire history of all concerned parties first, shouldn't the same apply to any comments about Israel, or the US? I don't see pro-genocide commenters being told to shut up because they don't know the completely history of the Ottoman Empire.

3. golergka ◴[] No.41871062[source]
Going back just to the Mandate seems like a very arbitrary point. It forgets about Egyptian colonisation of Palestine in 19th century, as well as treatment of Jewish communities across the whole Arab world, which explains a lot about the conflict and it's history.
replies(1): >>41871371 #
4. ◴[] No.41871371{3}[source]
5. justanotheratom ◴[] No.41871388[source]
Funny how lot of conflicts can be traced back to "Great" Britain:

- Israel Palestine. - India Pakistan. - Apartheid in South Africa. - .. anything else?

6. gopher_space ◴[] No.41871612[source]
It's not a nuanced political situation people need to spend time teasing apart, it's just bloodthirst being perpetuated generationally. There's no subtext to this conflict that won't sound absolutely insane to an outsider.