←back to thread

Cats are (almost) liquid

(www.cell.com)
253 points lnyan | 8 comments | 17 Oct 24 11:43 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
joshuamcginnis ◴[17 Oct 24 15:01 UTC] No.41870323[source]▶
FYI, the cats are not literally almost liquid in body composition.
replies(3): >>41870363 #>>41870380 #>>41870545 #
t-3 ◴[17 Oct 24 15:26 UTC] No.41870545[source]▶
"Almost" is a bit vague and probably too strong, but they are mostly water, just like other mammals.
replies(2): >>41870610 #>>41870691 #
1. krapp ◴[17 Oct 24 15:33 UTC] No.41870610[source]▶
Therefore they are more properly classified as soups.
replies(2): >>41870809 #>>41870936 #
2. maxbond ◴[17 Oct 24 15:51 UTC] No.41870809[source]▶
Noted ontologist Pirate Software would argue that cats are a Wellington, not a soup.

https://youtube.com/shorts/MnAegCmJ7Xk

replies(2): >>41870962 #>>41871077 #
3. fluoridation ◴[17 Oct 24 16:06 UTC] No.41870936[source]▶
Save for their skeletons and other dry structures like hair and shells, animals are in fact gels.
replies(1): >>41871526 #
4. krapp ◴[17 Oct 24 16:09 UTC] No.41870962[source]▶
I can't refute his logic.
5. orangeartist ◴[17 Oct 24 16:19 UTC] No.41871077[source]▶
I'm surprised to see this guy show up in a positive light after his false flagging campaign.
replies(1): >>41871454 #
6. sleazebreeze ◴[17 Oct 24 17:03 UTC] No.41871454{3}[source]▶
What false flagging campaign are you referring to? I am not familiar.
replies(1): >>41871547 #
7. WJW ◴[17 Oct 24 17:12 UTC] No.41871526[source]▶
Maybe they're more broth-like? Also the paper at https://www.drgoulu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rheology-... seems to indicate that they are "active rheological materials" and therefore probably non-Newtonian.
8. orangeartist ◴[17 Oct 24 17:15 UTC] No.41871547{4}[source]▶
He's taken down at least a dozen videos criticizing him by using his position as a youtuber with a million+ subscribers. Originally it was just videos referencing his "maldavius figtree" fursona, but now it's anything that portrays him in a negative way.