Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    253 points lnyan | 14 comments | | HN request time: 0.419s | source | bottom
    1. joshuamcginnis ◴[] No.41870323[source]
    FYI, the cats are not literally almost liquid in body composition.
    replies(3): >>41870363 #>>41870380 #>>41870545 #
    2. ◴[] No.41870363[source]
    3. t-3 ◴[] No.41870545[source]
    "Almost" is a bit vague and probably too strong, but they are mostly water, just like other mammals.
    replies(2): >>41870610 #>>41870691 #
    4. krapp ◴[] No.41870610[source]
    Therefore they are more properly classified as soups.
    replies(2): >>41870809 #>>41870936 #
    5. joshuamcginnis ◴[] No.41870691[source]
    That's a lot of ambiguity for a scientific paper. Even if it's true (Cats are about 60-70% water), that's not the point of the title.

    I suspect its because it makes for a catchy headline.

    replies(2): >>41870785 #>>41872522 #
    6. accrual ◴[] No.41870785{3}[source]
    I agree. I think it's a bit of nod into the playfulness most associate with cats. I don't mind though, cats are one subject I'm okay with some leeway in the rigorousness of the article title.
    7. maxbond ◴[] No.41870809{3}[source]
    Noted ontologist Pirate Software would argue that cats are a Wellington, not a soup.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/MnAegCmJ7Xk

    replies(2): >>41870962 #>>41871077 #
    8. fluoridation ◴[] No.41870936{3}[source]
    Save for their skeletons and other dry structures like hair and shells, animals are in fact gels.
    replies(1): >>41871526 #
    9. krapp ◴[] No.41870962{4}[source]
    I can't refute his logic.
    10. orangeartist ◴[] No.41871077{4}[source]
    I'm surprised to see this guy show up in a positive light after his false flagging campaign.
    replies(1): >>41871454 #
    11. sleazebreeze ◴[] No.41871454{5}[source]
    What false flagging campaign are you referring to? I am not familiar.
    replies(1): >>41871547 #
    12. WJW ◴[] No.41871526{4}[source]
    Maybe they're more broth-like? Also the paper at https://www.drgoulu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rheology-... seems to indicate that they are "active rheological materials" and therefore probably non-Newtonian.
    13. orangeartist ◴[] No.41871547{6}[source]
    He's taken down at least a dozen videos criticizing him by using his position as a youtuber with a million+ subscribers. Originally it was just videos referencing his "maldavius figtree" fursona, but now it's anything that portrays him in a negative way.
    14. aithrowawaycomm ◴[] No.41872522{3}[source]
    Catchy headline, but also in a fluid in a dynamical sense - cats "flow" into spaces when exploring by trial-and-error testing openings with their body size, but they are also only "almost" liquid in that for especially narrow openings they are reluctant to poke their heads in, presumably because they might get stuck.

    The contrast with dogs in the introduction is instructive: dogs tend to hunt over open fields rather than chasing prey into narrow dens, so it makes sense they would tend to make conservative eyeball judgments about whether they can fit into certain spaces. But cats will try to corner their prey in a tunnel/etc, so they have good reason to rely more on touch and experimentation ("ecologically-valid strategy").