←back to thread

253 points lnyan | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.407s | source
Show context
joshuamcginnis[dead post] ◴[] No.41870262[source]
[flagged]
bayindirh ◴[] No.41870334[source]
When asking these kinds of questions, I always remind myself "The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge" [0].

On the other hand, I believe that researching how animals think, behave and "work" in general, is a very important part of being human. They're alive, too, and they defy tons of prejudice we have about them over and over. We need to revise tons of knowledge about animals and other living things, in general.

[0]: https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/library/UsefulnessHa...

replies(1): >>41870398 #
joshuamcginnis ◴[] No.41870398[source]
So what exactly is your criteria for when a study should or should not be publicly funded?
replies(3): >>41870448 #>>41870504 #>>41870599 #
1. rootusrootus ◴[] No.41870504[source]
This whole thread started because you implied this study was worthless. Would be interested to hear your criteria.
replies(1): >>41870560 #
2. joshuamcginnis ◴[] No.41870560[source]
It's entirely rational and reasonable for someone to at least ask and receive a decent response to the question, "Why should my tax dollars have been used to funded this research?" Academia should have great responses lined up which garner continued support from the public.

But the fact that we aren't even allowed to ask questions without immediately being shut down as dissenters of all publicly funded research is problematic.

Public research should absolutely be at least partially evaluated by the very people funding it to begin with.