←back to thread

230 points mdp2021 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
avar ◴[] No.41868092[source]
This article doesn't even try to address what I feel is the deeper and more interesting question (but probably one that can't be answered): Why is it that horses, cows, giraffes and birds have all had to come up with a purely passive solution of "locking" themselves in place, either via their joints (for the four-legged), or via the tendon mechanism described here for birds?

I.e. why wasn't in simpler in evolutionary terms to come up with some mechanism where 1% of the brain was dedicated to the relatively simple task of "station keeping", while the rest of the brain could benefit from sleep?

replies(9): >>41868139 #>>41868150 #>>41868707 #>>41869047 #>>41869387 #>>41869517 #>>41870381 #>>41872718 #>>41879066 #
1. danans ◴[] No.41870381[source]
> I.e. why wasn't in simpler in evolutionary terms to come up with some mechanism where 1% of the brain was dedicated to the relatively simple task of "station keeping",

Supposedly this is how dolphins sleep, shutting off part of the brain and using the other half to swim.

https://us.whales.org/whales-dolphins/how-do-dolphins-sleep/....

replies(1): >>41870536 #
2. HarHarVeryFunny ◴[] No.41870536[source]
I think all aquatic mammals do this - they don't have much choice since they need to surface to breathe, so need to be semi-awake all the time.