←back to thread

400 points dulvui | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
mgoetzke ◴[] No.41857244[source]
it also leaks the audio of tabs before logging in.

Even though I had disabled all 'restore' applications features, macos sometimes decides to 'start' browsers BEFORE logging in after a restart AND those start auto-playing audio from whatever was paused before the reboot (or many days before).

Since then I went rather deep disabling that feature, but I never trusted it.

replies(7): >>41857258 #>>41857358 #>>41857362 #>>41857411 #>>41857615 #>>41857667 #>>41857946 #
Jerrrrrrry ◴[] No.41857362[source]
They want their TCP/IP stack and safari browser hot and ready for their demanders of instant gratification.

In the long run, they barter this goodwill for "Safari is shit" credit until they and Google force the internet until a browser-turned App-Play-Store war.

Both companies win, and can blame the other company - all while incentivising anti-competition behavior and benefiting from their own organizational, yet altruistic, self-interests happening to coincidentally collude in similar, yet distinctly more complicated cases of creating monopolies spanning multiple domains.

The internet was captured, gamified, commoditized, and vertically integrated into a handful of giga-Corps.

your mobile devices are essentially tracking devices you are addicted to, and the government is too interested in these shiny grandiose things and their use in facilitating government functions without any real consequence, they fail to see the systematic risks that they themselves have allowed to proliferate by not enforcing stricter laws for systematically - exploitable intersections of law, technology, and business.

replies(4): >>41857456 #>>41857535 #>>41858196 #>>41859496 #
lukan ◴[] No.41857456[source]
"they fail to see the systematic risks"

Or they also fail at providing a solution. Would you prefer diletantic government intervention in this area instead?

replies(4): >>41857493 #>>41857767 #>>41858381 #>>41861042 #
phoe-krk ◴[] No.41857493[source]
The differences between governments and megacorps are dwindling and the two are becoming much more alike one another. We already live in global technofeudalism.
replies(1): >>41857509 #
eru ◴[] No.41857509[source]
Alas, no. By and large, governments are still vastly less competent than multinational corporations. MNCs also don't force you to pay taxes or buy their products.
replies(10): >>41857522 #>>41857727 #>>41857835 #>>41857887 #>>41858025 #>>41858033 #>>41858148 #>>41858462 #>>41858819 #>>41861859 #
FollowingTheDao ◴[] No.41858025[source]
You are "forced to pay taxes" to have schools and roads and rescue services and law and everything else that makes the United States still a mostly habitable place to live.

Corporations do not force you to pay taxes YET. When the corporations get in total control and you cannot even vote just wait to see what a slave you are.

replies(1): >>41865437 #
eru ◴[] No.41865437[source]
> You are "forced to pay taxes" to have schools and roads and rescue services and law and everything else that makes the United States still a mostly habitable place to live.

I don't live in the US, and don't pay taxes for that. Most of the things you mention aren't even public goods. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good_(economics))

In any case, I grew up in Germany and have adopted Singapore as my home. And in comparison I am very happy that my overall tax rates here are perhaps a third of what they would be in Germany, while the services provided here are at least three times as good. (But the latter is subjective.)

Not incidentally, Singapore is perhaps the most well run city on the globe, and the place most run like an MNC.

> Corporations do not force you to pay taxes YET. When the corporations get in total control and you cannot even vote just wait to see what a slave you are.

Huh? That seems about as relevant as making an analogous argument against current real world governments by pointing out that someone might clone Stalin.

Yes, theoretically possible, but rather far-fetched.

replies(1): >>41868644 #
1. FollowingTheDao ◴[] No.41868644[source]
Singapore is a success because of the government:

https://www.npr.org/2015/03/29/395811510/how-singapore-becam...

"Some of the biggest sectors domestically — shipbuilding, electronics, banking, and now they're very involved in private banking — got their start because Lee Kuan Yew and the government specially directed state funds into those areas," Kurlantzick says.

The government also provided social services like housing and health care, in a way liberal economists applauded."

"He understood the politics of this very diverse place, and put together the laws, including the labor laws, that created a stable, peaceful place that multinationals were looking for," Lim says.

And it is good for you, but what about people who are not you?

"People live well, but the per capita GDP conceals a high level of inequality, so that is definitely a major issue in Singapore today and one of the things that the current prime minister has focused on," he says.