←back to thread

552 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
freedomben ◴[] No.41809900[source]
Notably, Firefox is not removing v2 support (at least for now as of March 2024)

> Firefox, however, has no plans to deprecate MV2 and will continue to support MV2 extensions for the foreseeable future. And even if we re-evaluate this decision at some point down the road, we anticipate providing a notice of at least 12 months for developers to adjust accordingly and not feel rushed.[1]

[1]: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manif...

replies(5): >>41810093 #>>41810602 #>>41812042 #>>41816445 #>>41818422 #
EasyMark ◴[] No.41810602[source]
To my knowledge the “big” chrome engine alternatives aren’t either. I know that Vivaldi and Brave plan on keeping around v2 as long as it is economically feasible
replies(8): >>41812032 #>>41812044 #>>41812235 #>>41812473 #>>41812812 #>>41813683 #>>41816147 #>>41817483 #
Sophira ◴[] No.41812473[source]
Are you certain? The last I heard about it from Vivaldi[0], they were only going to keep the MV2 code around so long as it's in the upstream codebase:

> We will keep Manifest v2 for as long as it’s still available in Chromium. We expect to drop support in June 2025, but we may maintain it longer or be forced to drop support for it sooner, depending on the precise nature of the changes to the code.

Note that June 2025 is the same date Google plans to drop support completely[1].

[0] https://vivaldi.com/blog/manifest-v3-update-vivaldi-is-futur...

[1] https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate...

replies(2): >>41812748 #>>41812787 #
bambax ◴[] No.41812787[source]
But... what could possibly be the point of using a chromium based browser that is not Chrome, if not for MV2 support?
replies(3): >>41813627 #>>41815409 #>>41816366 #
andmalc ◴[] No.41815409[source]
MS Edge, Arc, and Sidekick have features Chrome doesn't such as split screen, side panels, and vertical tabs. Likewise for Firefox forks such as Zen.
replies(1): >>41816690 #
aydyn ◴[] No.41816690[source]
None of those things are anything close to killer features much less reasons to switch. Verticle tabs, seriously?
replies(5): >>41816937 #>>41816938 #>>41817314 #>>41819225 #>>41819402 #
KetoManx64 ◴[] No.41819225[source]
Sorry that your personal use case doesn't match my use case and workflow. You keep using your tools and I'll keep using the ones I like.
replies(1): >>41857248 #
aydyn ◴[] No.41857248[source]
Sorry, but I mean objectively it is not. Its a gimmick, not a UI defining feature. You are using the exact same tools I am: chromium.

Chromium but with more invasion of privacy.

replies(1): >>41862762 #
KetoManx64 ◴[] No.41862762[source]
What makes you an expert on what makes a feature a gimmick? You have no idea of how other people use and optimize their productivity workflows around the use of this "gimmick". Your opinion is far from "objective" .
replies(1): >>41867818 #
1. aydyn ◴[] No.41867818[source]
neither is yours but okay